我国超期羁押救济机制研究

Relief Mechanism Research of Extended Detention in China

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

邓畅

导师:

冯涛

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

超期羁押;救济机制;必要性;制度重构

摘要:

在我国的刑事司法实践中,超期羁押一直都是久治不愈的顽症,执法机关及其工作人员滥用法律赋予的权力限制或剥夺公民人身自由的情况屡屡发生。虽然,我国《刑事诉讼法》赋予了涉罪公民相关的权利,但对于被超期羁押者所遭受的权利损害来说,这些原则性的规定措施是远远不够的。而且我国关于超期羁押的救济程序相对于国际刑事司法准则来说,保障的程度、范围以及制度方面尚存进一步发展的空间。俗语说,无救济便无权利,当公民基本权利遭受侵害时,获得救济是维护其权利的必然选择。本文针对被超期羁押群体权利得不到救济的现实问题,立足国情,适当前瞻,就构建我国超期羁押救济机制的问题提出若干建议,以切实保障他们的合法权益。 全文由引言、正文和结语构成,主要内容如下: 第一部分,我国超期羁押的现状以及救济机制的缺失。文章首先从超期羁押的概念着手,从社会现状上来分析它带来的危害以及产生的原因,超期羁押的泛滥不仅造成了对司法资源的浪费,也是对人权的严重侵害,违背了国际上的司法潮流,非常不利于我国的法治进程的推进。在对超期羁押产生原因的深层分析之中,得出超期羁押救济机制在我国现状中十分缺失的结论,接下来,文章从立法层面和司法实践两个角度对我国超期羁押救济制度的虚无化状况加以分析,从而为下一部分论述超期羁押救济制度建构的必要性做出铺垫。 第二部分,超期羁押救济制度建构的必要性。造成超期羁押的原因很多,也就使得它不可能立马被消除掉,顽疾需要慢慢来治疗,然而,超期羁押现象的继续存在,使得被羁押者的权利侵害也在持续发生;因此,对被羁押者提供救济显得尤为重要,建构超期羁押救济制度的任务也就变得不可或缺。这一部分从人权保障的需要、程序正义的体现、刑事诉讼系统的完整性、以及对国际义务的遵守几个方面加以阐述,强调对被羁押群体提供权利救济的必要性。 第三部分,构建我国超期羁押司法救济体制的整体思路,这也是文章的中心部分。通过上面两个部分的阐述,得出建构超期羁押救济制度是我国的当务之急,最后一部分是全文的中心内容,对我国超期羁押救济制度的构建思路予以了详细的说明,立足我国的现行相关法律规定,在借鉴其他法治国家合理制度的基础上,探讨构建符合我国国情并具有可行性的救济措施。从宪政角度确定相关规定来保证我国超期羁押救济机制的构建,并给予被羁押人一系列能行使的具体权利。文章主要从完善对被超期羁押群体权利的宪法保障这个基础上,提出包括改革取保候审制度、建立司法审查制度、确立人身保护令制度、引入被羁押人抗告制度和完善国家刑事赔偿制度这五个建议以及保证其实施的相应配套措施,并从具体方面详细论述怎样构建一个合理可行的救济机制,既符合我国的法治背景和司法现状,又能真正切实地保护被超期羁押群体的人身权利。

学科:

诉讼法学

提交日期

2018-01-11

引用参考

邓畅. 我国超期羁押救济机制研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2010.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 我国超期羁押救济机制研究
  • dc.title
  • Relief Mechanism Research of Extended Detention in China
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20070301060648
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 邓畅
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2010
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 冯涛
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 超期羁押;;救济机制;;必要性;;制度重构
  • dc.subject
  • Extended Detention;;Relief Mechanism;;Necessity;;Mechanism Reconstruction
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 在我国的刑事司法实践中,超期羁押一直都是久治不愈的顽症,执法机关及其工作人员滥用法律赋予的权力限制或剥夺公民人身自由的情况屡屡发生。虽然,我国《刑事诉讼法》赋予了涉罪公民相关的权利,但对于被超期羁押者所遭受的权利损害来说,这些原则性的规定措施是远远不够的。而且我国关于超期羁押的救济程序相对于国际刑事司法准则来说,保障的程度、范围以及制度方面尚存进一步发展的空间。俗语说,无救济便无权利,当公民基本权利遭受侵害时,获得救济是维护其权利的必然选择。本文针对被超期羁押群体权利得不到救济的现实问题,立足国情,适当前瞻,就构建我国超期羁押救济机制的问题提出若干建议,以切实保障他们的合法权益。 全文由引言、正文和结语构成,主要内容如下: 第一部分,我国超期羁押的现状以及救济机制的缺失。文章首先从超期羁押的概念着手,从社会现状上来分析它带来的危害以及产生的原因,超期羁押的泛滥不仅造成了对司法资源的浪费,也是对人权的严重侵害,违背了国际上的司法潮流,非常不利于我国的法治进程的推进。在对超期羁押产生原因的深层分析之中,得出超期羁押救济机制在我国现状中十分缺失的结论,接下来,文章从立法层面和司法实践两个角度对我国超期羁押救济制度的虚无化状况加以分析,从而为下一部分论述超期羁押救济制度建构的必要性做出铺垫。 第二部分,超期羁押救济制度建构的必要性。造成超期羁押的原因很多,也就使得它不可能立马被消除掉,顽疾需要慢慢来治疗,然而,超期羁押现象的继续存在,使得被羁押者的权利侵害也在持续发生;因此,对被羁押者提供救济显得尤为重要,建构超期羁押救济制度的任务也就变得不可或缺。这一部分从人权保障的需要、程序正义的体现、刑事诉讼系统的完整性、以及对国际义务的遵守几个方面加以阐述,强调对被羁押群体提供权利救济的必要性。 第三部分,构建我国超期羁押司法救济体制的整体思路,这也是文章的中心部分。通过上面两个部分的阐述,得出建构超期羁押救济制度是我国的当务之急,最后一部分是全文的中心内容,对我国超期羁押救济制度的构建思路予以了详细的说明,立足我国的现行相关法律规定,在借鉴其他法治国家合理制度的基础上,探讨构建符合我国国情并具有可行性的救济措施。从宪政角度确定相关规定来保证我国超期羁押救济机制的构建,并给予被羁押人一系列能行使的具体权利。文章主要从完善对被超期羁押群体权利的宪法保障这个基础上,提出包括改革取保候审制度、建立司法审查制度、确立人身保护令制度、引入被羁押人抗告制度和完善国家刑事赔偿制度这五个建议以及保证其实施的相应配套措施,并从具体方面详细论述怎样构建一个合理可行的救济机制,既符合我国的法治背景和司法现状,又能真正切实地保护被超期羁押群体的人身权利。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • In practice of criminal justice, extended detention is long-term extremely problem. The civil rights have been violated frequently, such as that law enforcement officers limited and deprived the civil right and freedom of state citizens by virtue of the prerogative of the State. "The Code of Criminal Procedure "has conferred related-rights to suspect, but these rights do not go far enough for detriment of detainees rights. In addition, relief process of extended detention in our country relative to the International Criminal Justice Standards, the extent and scope and system of relief system have also room for further development. As the saying goes, no relief no rights. When the civil basic rights are infringed, relief is the natural choice to safeguard civil rights. This report advises some proposals to constitute relief mechanism of extended detention when the remedies of extended detention groups were not properly addressed in order to person whose basic civil right is in fringed get hold of the pressing guarantee. Except the introduction and conclusion, the totally full text divides into three parts, which is about 30,000 words and the main contents is as follows: 1. The status of China's extended detention and relief mechanism is clearly flawed. Start with the concept of extended detention to start with analysis from the social status it brings up the dangers as well as the causes of the extended detention not only caused a waste of judicial resources, but also a serious violation of human rights contrary to international judicial trend is very the process is not conducive to the advancement of China's rule of law. In the deep causes of extended detention the analysis, leads to our extended detention of relief mechanism, lack of status, the level of legislation and judicial practice from the two aspects to describe our extended detention system, emptiness, relief can not be extended to China's detention of groups and timely relief, so as the next section, namely, construction of China's need for extended detention relief system to make bedding. 2. Construction of relief system of extended detention system, the need for discussion. Caused by extended detention for various reasons, thus making it impossible to be eliminated flew away, chronic illness, we must go slowly to treatment, however, extended detention exists, violations of the rights of detainees are continuing; so, the detainees is particularly important to provide relief to construct the task of extended detention relief system also become indispensable. This part from the need for protection of human rights,procedural justice,the embodiment of the integrity of the criminal system, as well as several aspects of compliance with international obligations to be elaborated, laying emphasis on the rights of detainees groups need relief. 3. Construction of China's extended detention judicial relief system as a whole train of thought. Two parts by the above findings, interpretations, our relief system for construction of extended detention is a priority, the last part is a central element of the full text of our extended detention of relief system, built to be a detailed description of ideas, based on the existing relevant laws and regulations in China , in the rule of law drawing on other countries on the basis of a reasonable system, to explore how to build in line with China's national conditions and with the feasibility of relief measures. From the constitutional point of view to determine the relevant provisions of the relief mechanism to ensure that our construction of extended detention, and to give the detainees a series of specific rights can be exercised. This chapter mainly from the perfect group rights have been extended detention on the basis of the constitutional protection was proposed including the establishment of rights and interests of detainees relief system, the introduction of habeas corpus system, improve the bail system, establish a system of judicial review, and strengthen the right of lawyers to intervene and improve the state The six criminal compensation system as well as to ensure appropriate support measures for its implementation, its elaborate on what specific areas to build a reasonable and feasible relief mechanisms, both in line with our rule of law and judicial background of the status quo, and can effectively protect the population of extended detention personal rights.
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925.2
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2010-03-20
回到顶部