宋例新探

A New Analysis on the “Lì” in Song Dynasty

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

吕志兴

归属院系：

行政法学院（纪检监察学院）

作者：

吕志兴 ;曾友林

摘要：

在中国古代,例的基本含义有二:一指判例或先例,此乃本源之义;一指法律原则或规定,多用于法典、制敕中。宋代以例为构词元素的法律术语多从第一义项,除条例、则例外,大多指判例、先例和惯例。宋例与制定法的关系是"法所不载,然后用例",是制定法的辅法,在法律体系中位阶最低。但惟常例(判例、先例)和惯例性质的例才是制定法的辅法,是法律渊源,而优例则否。宋例虽备受批评,但因其具有补制定法之不足的功能及简便、风险小等优点,在实践中被大量援用,其实际地位比较高。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2017-05-15

学科：

法律史学

收录：

北大核心期刊; CSSCI

提交日期：

2018-01-11

引用参考：

吕志兴;曾友林. 宋例新探[J]. 现代法学,2017(03):21-30.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 宋例新探
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 吕志兴;曾友林
  • dc.contributor.author
  • LV-Zhixing;ZENG-Youlin;Administrative Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law;Longgang District People's Court
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学行政法学院;深圳市龙岗区人民法院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 现代法学
  • dc.publisher
  • Modern Law Science
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2017
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 03
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.39;No.211
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 21-30
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2017-05-15
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 宋例;;判例;;先例;;惯例;;法律渊源
  • dc.subject
  • "Lì" in Song Dynasty;;case;;precedent;;ordinance;;legal source
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 在中国古代,例的基本含义有二:一指判例或先例,此乃本源之义;一指法律原则或规定,多用于法典、制敕中。宋代以例为构词元素的法律术语多从第一义项,除条例、则例外,大多指判例、先例和惯例。宋例与制定法的关系是"法所不载,然后用例",是制定法的辅法,在法律体系中位阶最低。但惟常例(判例、先例)和惯例性质的例才是制定法的辅法,是法律渊源,而优例则否。宋例虽备受批评,但因其具有补制定法之不足的功能及简便、风险小等优点,在实践中被大量援用,其实际地位比较高。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • In ancient China,the term"lì"had two basic meanings: one referred to a precedent or an ordinance; the other referred to legal principles or rules. The former was the original meaning and applied to most legal items in Song Dynasty,except regulations; the latter was the frequently-used meaning in the codes and decrees. There was a legal proverb that could describe the relationship between "lì"and the statute law: "If there was no relevant provision in codes,‘lì'would be invoked. "In a word,"lì"was subordinate to the statutes and the lowest rank in legal system. However,it should be pointed out that "lì"was a sub-statute and a source of law,only in terms of precedent or practice. In fact,"lì"was frequently invoked and played an important role in Song Dynasty,despite suffering strong criticisms. Because "lì"could supply deficiencies of statutes and had some advantages,such as convenience,low risk.
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 50-1020/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1001-2397
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 2.074
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • DF092
回到顶部