司法会计鉴定人与专家辅助人参与诉讼比较研究——以注册会计师为主体

A Comparative Study of Certified Public Accountant to Participate in the Proceeding as the Judicial Accounting Appraiser and the Expert Assistant

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

范伟红

作者:

唐媛媛 ; 范伟红

摘要:

作为财务会计领域的专家,注册会计师参与诉讼担当司法会计鉴定人和专家辅助人已成为惯例与潮流。对二者在诉讼中资格、地位、权利义务、意见效力等方面加以对比,发现新鉴定意见审查模式对提高鉴定质量、减少误判、维护程序公平具有重要的意义,但由于立法缺陷会诱发重复鉴定、庭审拖延等负面效应,建议立法上通过完善专家辅助人制度、改革司法鉴定制度、制定专门司法会计师执业规范为注册会计师开展两类业务提供制度保障,行业协会应强化对注册会计师专业素养的培训,注册会计师自身需调整知识结构、摆正心态、积极参与诉讼。

语种:

中文

出版日期:

2016-09-10

学科:

诉讼法学

收录:

北大核心期刊

提交日期

2018-01-11

引用参考

唐媛媛;范伟红. 司法会计鉴定人与专家辅助人参与诉讼比较研究——以注册会计师为主体[J]. 财会通讯,2016(25):24-29+4.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 司法会计鉴定人与专家辅助人参与诉讼比较研究——以注册会计师为主体
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 唐媛媛;范伟红
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Tang Yuanyuan;Fan Weihong;Southwest University of Political Science & Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学;
  • dc.publisher
  • 财会通讯
  • dc.publisher
  • Communication of Finance and Accounting
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2016
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 25
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.717
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 24-29+4
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2016-09-10
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 注册会计师;;司法会计鉴定人;;专家辅助人;;诉讼活动
  • dc.subject
  • Certified public accountant;;Judicial accounting appraiser;;Expert assistant;;Litigation activities
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 作为财务会计领域的专家,注册会计师参与诉讼担当司法会计鉴定人和专家辅助人已成为惯例与潮流。对二者在诉讼中资格、地位、权利义务、意见效力等方面加以对比,发现新鉴定意见审查模式对提高鉴定质量、减少误判、维护程序公平具有重要的意义,但由于立法缺陷会诱发重复鉴定、庭审拖延等负面效应,建议立法上通过完善专家辅助人制度、改革司法鉴定制度、制定专门司法会计师执业规范为注册会计师开展两类业务提供制度保障,行业协会应强化对注册会计师专业素养的培训,注册会计师自身需调整知识结构、摆正心态、积极参与诉讼。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • A feature of the new procedure law is establishing the expert assistant system,as an important supporting system of the appraiser program.As a specialist in the field of financial accounting,certified public accountant involved in litigation as the judicial accounting appraiser and the expert assistant has become a practice and trend.Compare the two in lawsuit qualification,status,rights and obligations,comments effect,the paper finds that the new expert opinion review system plays an important role in improving the quality of identification,reducing misjudgment,maintaining procedural justice.But because of the legislative defects,this system may cause negative effects such as repeated identification,trial delay.In order to provide institutional guarantee for the certified public accountant to carry out the two types of business,the law-making organ should perfect the expert assistant system,reform judicial expertise system and make special judicial accounting professional standards.The Chinese institution of certified public accountants should strengthen the professional training of CPA.The CPA should adjust knowledge structure,keep a positive attitude,and take an active part in Litigation activities.
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 42-1103/F
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1002-8072
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.133
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925;D918.95
回到顶部