论终止鉴定——以新《司法鉴定程序通则》为视角

On the Termination of Appraisal— with a Vision of the New General Principles of Judicial Appraisal Procedure

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

贾治辉 ; 朱兰

归属院系：

刑事侦查学院

作者：

贾治辉 ; 朱兰 ;宋利利 ;朱昱

摘要：

在依法治国和以审判为中心的背景下,必然要求国家的司法鉴定行政管理部门通过修订规则,不断地优化司法鉴定程序来提高司法鉴定质量和公信力。完善终止鉴定程序是优化司法鉴定程序的重要内容,明确终止鉴定条件和程序规范,不仅有利于诉讼程序的安定和效率的提高,而且有利于提高司法鉴定的质量,维护司法鉴定机构的工作秩序,预防司法鉴定风险。在司法鉴定实践中,要准确把握新《司法鉴定程序通则》规定的终止鉴定的情形,正确地运用程序终止鉴定,认真履行终止鉴定通知、说明理由和存档等义务,以避免滥用终止鉴定来逃避鉴定责任。结合司法鉴定实践对司法鉴定人和司法鉴定机构怎样启动、审查、决定终止鉴定等规范管理问题,以及终止鉴定后委托人的救济途径及处理等问题进行充分探讨和总结。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2016-07-15

学科：

诉讼法学

提交日期：

2018-01-11

引用参考：

贾治辉;朱兰;宋利利;朱昱. 论终止鉴定——以新《司法鉴定程序通则》为视角[J]. 中国司法鉴定,2016(04):19-24.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 论终止鉴定——以新《司法鉴定程序通则》为视角
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 贾治辉;朱兰;宋利利;朱昱
  • dc.contributor.author
  • JIA Zhi-hui;ZHU Lan;SONG Li-li;ZHU Yu;Judicial Authentication Center, Institute of Criminal Investigation, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学刑事侦查学院西南政法大学司法鉴定中心;
  • dc.publisher
  • 中国司法鉴定
  • dc.publisher
  • Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2016
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 04
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.87
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 19-24
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2016-07-15
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 司法鉴定程序通则;;终止鉴定;;鉴定启动;;鉴定风险
  • dc.subject
  • The General Principles of Judicial Appraisal Procedure;;termination of appraisal;;initiation of appraisal;;risk in appraisal
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 在依法治国和以审判为中心的背景下,必然要求国家的司法鉴定行政管理部门通过修订规则,不断地优化司法鉴定程序来提高司法鉴定质量和公信力。完善终止鉴定程序是优化司法鉴定程序的重要内容,明确终止鉴定条件和程序规范,不仅有利于诉讼程序的安定和效率的提高,而且有利于提高司法鉴定的质量,维护司法鉴定机构的工作秩序,预防司法鉴定风险。在司法鉴定实践中,要准确把握新《司法鉴定程序通则》规定的终止鉴定的情形,正确地运用程序终止鉴定,认真履行终止鉴定通知、说明理由和存档等义务,以避免滥用终止鉴定来逃避鉴定责任。结合司法鉴定实践对司法鉴定人和司法鉴定机构怎样启动、审查、决定终止鉴定等规范管理问题,以及终止鉴定后委托人的救济途径及处理等问题进行充分探讨和总结。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Under the background of the rule of law and trial-centered judicial system, it is inevitable that the administrative department of judicial appraisal should constantly optimize the judicial appraisal procedure to improve the quality and credibility of judicial appraisal through revision of the rules. The termination procedure is an important part of optimizing the judicial appraisal procedures. The clarification of the condition and procedure of termination is not only beneficial to the stability of the proceedings and improvement of the efficiency, but also beneficial to improving the quality of judicial appraisal, maintaining the work order of judicial appraisal institutions, and preventing risks in judicial appraisal. This paper discusses the following issues: in the practice of judicial appraisal, how to accurately understand the situation of termination in the new General Principles of Judicial Appraisal Procedure, to correctly use the termination procedure, to earnestly implement the obligation of notification, explanation and archiving, to avoid abuse of termination procedure to evade responsibility. In combination with judicial appraisal practice, this paper also discusses the administration of judicial appraisers and judicial appraisal institutions regarding the initiation, examination and termination decision of appraisal, and the remedies for clients after termination of appraisal.
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 31-1863/N
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1671-2072
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.364
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D918.9
回到顶部