解构与续造:当事人的陈述制度化构建

Deconstruction and Reconstruction: on the Party's Statements in Civil Action

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

黄宣

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

黄宣

摘要:

民事诉讼中,当事人既是案件事实的亲历者,最知悉案情,又是案件事实的最大利害关系人,其陈述的证明力较弱。将如此先天性不足的当事人的陈述,列为证据种类的首位,有违立法之科学。强化当事人的陈述之制度构建,并将当事人的陈述界定为自由心证的补充性地位,是民事诉讼制度精细化的必然选择。

语种:

中文

出版日期:

2015-07-03

学科:

诉讼法学

收录:

北大核心期刊; CSSCI

提交日期

2018-01-11

引用参考

黄宣. 解构与续造:当事人的陈述制度化构建[J]. 河北法学,2015(08):155-160.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 解构与续造:当事人的陈述制度化构建
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 黄宣
  • dc.contributor.author
  • HUANG Xuan;Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学法学院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 河北法学
  • dc.publisher
  • Hebei Law Science
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2015
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 08
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.33;No.262
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 155-160
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2015-07-03
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 陈述制度;;证据种类;;询问当事人;;民事诉讼制度
  • dc.subject
  • statement system;;the method of proof;;inquiring the party;;the civil procedure system
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 民事诉讼中,当事人既是案件事实的亲历者,最知悉案情,又是案件事实的最大利害关系人,其陈述的证明力较弱。将如此先天性不足的当事人的陈述,列为证据种类的首位,有违立法之科学。强化当事人的陈述之制度构建,并将当事人的陈述界定为自由心证的补充性地位,是民事诉讼制度精细化的必然选择。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • In civil action,the party is also the facts witness of the case and knows the case best,as well as has the greatest interest with the case. However, his or her statement is still weak. If the party's statements with deficiency are listed as the first type of evidence,it is contrary to the legislation and not scientific. It is the best choice to elaborate the civil procedure system by strengthening the construction of the party 's statement system and defining the statements of the party function as a supplementary role.
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 13-1023/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1002-3933
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.642
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925.1
回到顶部