破产立案标准理论创新与制度重构

Theoretical Innovation and System Re-construction of Standards on Bankruptcy Case

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

范伟红

归属院系：

商学院（监察审计学院）

作者：

范伟红 ;王鹏

摘要：

我国破产法没有区分可能采取的拯救与清算程序,统一按照清算程序的支付不能与资不抵债标准概括申请与受理条件,无形中提高了立案标准,推迟了立案时间,造成申请难、受理难以及法律适用难。本文的主要学术思想有两个,一是破产立案标准采用抽象的概括主义模式与我国的成文法以及司法传统不相适应,折中的列举主义有利于加强破产法与强制执行程序以及公司法的僵局与清算制度的衔接,有利于解决破产申请与受理上的法律适用难;二是降低受理门槛,将"支付不能与资不抵债"下单一的偿债标准降低到"财务危机"下偿债与经营标准满足其中之一就可,保障现代破产法预防与整顿经济秩序目标的实现。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2013-04-15

学科：

经济法学

收录：

CSSCI

提交日期：

2018-01-11

引用参考：

范伟红;王鹏. 破产立案标准理论创新与制度重构[J]. 学术探索,2013(04):66-72.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 破产立案标准理论创新与制度重构
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 范伟红;王鹏
  • dc.contributor.author
  • FAN Wei-hong1, WANG Peng2(1.Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, 400031, China; 2.Yunnan Fayan Law Office, Luquan, 651500, Yunnan, China)
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学司法会计研究中心;云南法研律师事务所;
  • dc.publisher
  • 学术探索
  • dc.publisher
  • Academic Exploration
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2013
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 04
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.161
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 66-72
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2013-04-15
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 破产标准;;折中列举主义;;支付不能;;经营危机标准
  • dc.subject
  • bankruptcy standards;compromising enumerationism;insolvency;standard of management crisis
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 我国破产法没有区分可能采取的拯救与清算程序,统一按照清算程序的支付不能与资不抵债标准概括申请与受理条件,无形中提高了立案标准,推迟了立案时间,造成申请难、受理难以及法律适用难。本文的主要学术思想有两个,一是破产立案标准采用抽象的概括主义模式与我国的成文法以及司法传统不相适应,折中的列举主义有利于加强破产法与强制执行程序以及公司法的僵局与清算制度的衔接,有利于解决破产申请与受理上的法律适用难;二是降低受理门槛,将"支付不能与资不抵债"下单一的偿债标准降低到"财务危机"下偿债与经营标准满足其中之一就可,保障现代破产法预防与整顿经济秩序目标的实现。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Chinese bankruptcy law does not distinguish rescue with liquidation that may be taken.The payment according to the liquidation process can not apply for and accept and hear a case on the standards of insolvency.Therefore,it indirectly raises the standards of filing a case,postpones the time of filing a case,resulting in the difficulty of application,accepting and hearing a case and the application of the law.This paper has two main academic thoughts.First,the Abstract generalizationism of the standards on bankruptcy case is incompatible with our statutes as well as the judicial tradition.The compromising enumerationism is conducive to enhancing the connection between the bankruptcy law and enforcement of the procedures,as well as between the deadlock of the company law and the liquidation system.It is conducive to resolving the difficulty of application,accepting and hearing a bankruptcy case.Second,it is important to reduce the threshold of accepting and hearing a case.The single standard of debt repayment under "insolvency" should be reduced to the standard of debt repayment,operating under "financial crisis",which is expected to guarantee the implementation of the modern bankruptcy law and the readjustment of the economic order.
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 司法部国家法治与法学理论研究一般项目(09SFB2042)
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 53-1148/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1006-723X
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D922.291.92
回到顶部