“调解优先”质疑论

Questions about “Mediation Priority”

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

田平安

归属院系：

法学院

作者：

田平安 ;吕辉

摘要：

法院调解在我国有着悠久的历史,是我国民事审判的特点和优势之一,其有效地弥补了刚性审判的不足,缓解了法院的案件压力,同时满足了当事人纠纷解决的多元需求,在一定程度上有利于和谐社会的构建。但当前的司法实践过分强调"调解优先",无异于是"调解为主"的翻版,既模糊是非,破坏规则之治,又违反了"自愿、合法"原则,不能彻底解决纠纷,也无助于真正实现社会和谐。因此,必须重新审视"调解优先"政策,吸取历史教训,在重新厘定法院调解概念和内涵的基础上,坚守"自愿、合法"底线,确立以保障诉权为前提的适当性、补充性的民事诉讼调解政策。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2013-01-01

学科：

民商法学; 诉讼法学

收录：

北大核心期刊; CSSCI

提交日期：

2018-01-11

引用参考：

田平安;吕辉. “调解优先”质疑论[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版),2013(01):54-60.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • “调解优先”质疑论
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 田平安;吕辉
  • dc.contributor.author
  • TIAN Ping-an, LV Hui(School of Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学法学院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 河南大学学报(社会科学版)
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Henan University(Social Science)
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2013
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.53;No.250
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 54-60
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2013-01-01
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 诉讼调解;;调解优先;;质疑
  • dc.subject
  • court mediation;mediation priority;questions
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 法院调解在我国有着悠久的历史,是我国民事审判的特点和优势之一,其有效地弥补了刚性审判的不足,缓解了法院的案件压力,同时满足了当事人纠纷解决的多元需求,在一定程度上有利于和谐社会的构建。但当前的司法实践过分强调"调解优先",无异于是"调解为主"的翻版,既模糊是非,破坏规则之治,又违反了"自愿、合法"原则,不能彻底解决纠纷,也无助于真正实现社会和谐。因此,必须重新审视"调解优先"政策,吸取历史教训,在重新厘定法院调解概念和内涵的基础上,坚守"自愿、合法"底线,确立以保障诉权为前提的适当性、补充性的民事诉讼调解政策。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Court mediation has a long history in China,which is the characteristic and advantage of China 's civil trial.It can effectively compensate for the lack of rigid trial,and ease the pressure of court cases.At the same time,it may meet the diverse needs of the parties to resolve disputes.To some extent,it is also in favor of building the harmonious society.Therefore,it should be affirmed.However,if we overly emphasize the "Mediate priority" in the current judicial practice,there is essentially no difference with the "mediation-based" policy.Destroying the rules of governance,"Mediate priority" will result in no standards of right or wrong.What's more,it will violate the principle of voluntary and Legitimacy.The policy not only can't completely solve the dispute,but also difficult to really achieve social harmony.Moreover,there is no appropriate social environment in China at present.Based on the foregoing,we must review the "mediation priority" policy and draw lessons from history in the time of modifying the Civil Procedure Law.Thus the appropriate and supplementary Court Mediation policy should be made so that we should strictly adhere to the "voluntary" "legal" bottom line,and safeguard the right of the appeal,on the basis of re-defining the concept and connotation of the court mediation.
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 41-1028/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1000-5242
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.572
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D926.2;D925.1
回到顶部